The
WikiWay suggests changing some of the original
WikiSyntax. For example, changed bullet points in the following way:
Original/Now:
* bullet level 1
* bullet level 2
Suggested:
* bullet level 1
** bullet level 2
I think the new style does make sense as it is slight fiddly getting the number of spaces correct. Might be worth adding in addition to current mechanism.
Thoughts?
--
JohnTalintyre - 05 Jun 2001
We could add two other shortcuts as well:
*N which is equalivent to * N times.
and
*. which repeats the previous * level or gives just one level.
eg.
*10 item is
********** item is
and
** item
*. another item
is
** item
** another item
--
NicholasLee - 05 Jun 2001
Hmm. I'd like that for the first level, but not for the the deeper
ones. Writing
* Important item
*** Less important
********* micro-mini item
doesn't look readable to me.
The same applies for the TWike headline syntax:
---+ Very Important Header
---+++++++ Very Un-important Header
I'm proposing (and already using) this syntax:
### Very Important Header ###
__Important Header__
*Smaller Header*
_Unimportant Header_
For me, I doesn't interfere with the regular
bold and
italic
syntax, as
PeterThoeny maintained in
AutomaticallyNumberedHeadings.
To the contrary, it seems quite naturally
to write a line of its own and then
bold it accordingly.
The (old)
TWikiDocumentation actually mimicks headlines
using lines surrounded by __
--
PeterKlausner - 06 Jun 2001
See also
BetterLists for other discussion around bullets. I do not recommend to go for the syntax with stars at the beginning of the line because it could have unwanted side effects. People sometimes paste text from other places into a TWiki page and it's possible that the first char happens to be a star.
If we add the new syntax then with a
required white space, i.e.
* bullet level 1
** bullet level 2
However, my preference is to relax the existing rule to allow arbitrary number of spaces as explained in
BetterLists, i.e.
* bullet level 1
* bullet level 2
* bullet level 3
--
PeterThoeny - 07 Jun 2001