Think about these before you choose a wiki
I think most wiki comparison charts seem to miss the point about what is important in a wiki, therefore it is hard to find information about the availability of the features listed below.
In my experience, if you want to set up a web for your organization, some of the main features you need are
- searchable MS Word, Excel and PDF attachments,
- preview of these
- ability to retrieve information from a variety of databases
- integration to existing authentication systems
- publishing workflow
- threaded conversation
- self-updating lists
- email submission
- easy form creation which retains data in a structured way
- good issue tracker
These are needed beacuse users want
- to have access to documents created earlier
- to see the documents prior to downloading them
- to search, see, structure emails within the collaboration system they use
- rely on data stored elsewhere
Also, they may incline to contribute more if they know their input
- is not lost in the chaos of a bad wiki
- considered a draft, a proposal, not the last word on a topic
And the Tracker is a very good link between actual everyday work and the wiki: helps you organize your day, check deadlines, get feedback, see what others are doing...
I guess TWiki is good for most of these. (Our company uses Plone, we like it, it is a bit clumsy though.)
I hope it helps some people to make a good wiki choice.
--
MiklosNyiri - 29 Jan 2006