Feature Proposal: Prevent autolinking of Wiki words specified in preferences
Motivation
Many jargon as well as corporate concepts (in my company and field of work) are in fact wiki words. Also Webs are allowed to be wiki words since Cairo release.
The ability to specify Wiki words that will not be autolinked will prevent unnecessary linking to superfluous pages as well as unexpected behaviour for the end user.
I imagine something like this in
TWikiPreferences:
* Set NOWIKIWORD = CorporateName, CorporateConcept, ProductName
If used sparsely, this option could prevent many unwanted links for my end user. However, i have no clue how difficult this would be to implement.
Description
Add preference option that allows list of wiki words that are not linked automatically.
--
JosMaccabiani - 27 Jun 2005
Impact and Available Solutions
Documentation
If necessary, user documentation of new features introduced by this proposal.
Examples
Example uses of features introduced by proposal.
Implementation
Any comments on how the feature is implemented or could be improved
Discussion:
Hmmm. Simply ignoring matching
wikiwords would be quite straightforward, though the general solution might be a bit harder.
But I'm not sure this is something we'd want to do, TBH. Linking to definitions of corporate concepts helps new starters considerably, and old hands can just ignore them. I generally encourage people to install
FindElsewherePlugin and establish a corporate identity web that contains definitions for all these terms.
--
CrawfordCurrie - 28 Jun 2005
Hi Crawford. Thanks for the reply. Actually for me, installing
FindElsewherePlugin and creating a main page that links to all the concepts and products that are
WikiNames did solve my need.
FeatureRejected?
--
JosMaccabiani - 28 Jun 2005
This was something I am interest in. I was looking to see if this was possibility because we have several comment words that don't make sense to like. For example
WebsphereMQ is a common one.
--
RickMach - 10 Oct 2005
What about using the
AliasPlugin for that?
--
MichaelDaum - 10 Oct 2005